مدل‌سازی دینامیکی تقطیر غشایی تماس مستقیم در هندسه صفحه تخت

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

2 استاد، گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

چکیده

در این مقاله، مطالعات مدل­سازی دینامیکی سیستم تقطیر غشایی تماس مستقیم در هندسه صفحه تخت ارائه شده است. ابتدا با اعمال موازنه­های جرم و انرژی، معادلات توصیف کننده رفتار دینامیکی فرآیند تقطیر غشایی تماس مستقیم در هندسه تخت محقق گردیده است. در ادامه به منظور حل عددی این معادلات در بستر نرم­افزار MATLAB، از روش خطوط استفاده شده است. جهت اطمینان از نتایج حاصل از مدل­سازی عددی، نتایج بدست آمده از مدل­سازی با نتایج تجربی موجود در مقالات با زمینه تحقیقاتی مرتبط، مقایسه و صحت­سنجی شده است. نتایج حاصل از صحت­سنجی، نشان­دهنده حداکثر خطای میانگین 05/4 درصد بین مدل­سازی و نتایج تجربی است. همچنین نتایج بدست آمده از مدل­سازی مفروض (برای پارامترهای موثر بر عملکرد سیستم تقطیر غشایی تماس مستقیم)، نشان می­دهد که تغییرات دمای جریان گرم غشاء بیشترین تاثیر را بر روی شار نفوذی به سمت سرد غشاء را دارد. به نحوی که افزایش 10% در دمای جریان گرم غشاء شار نفوذی از غشاء را 8/49% درصد افزایش می­دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


  •     Noamani S, Niroomand S, Rastgar M. Carbon-based polymer nanocomposite membranes for oily wastewater treatment. NPJ Clean Water. 2019;2:1–14. doi:10.1038/s41545-019-0044-z.
  •      Sadrzadeh M, Hajinasiri J, Bhattacharjee S, Pernitsky D. Nanofiltration of oil sands boiler feed water: Effect of pH on water flux and organic and dissolved solid rejection. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;141:339–53. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.011.
  •    Hayatbakhsh M, Sadrzadeh M, Pernitsky D, Bhattacharjee S, Hajinasiri J. Treatment of an in situ oil sands produced water by polymeric membranes. Desal Water Treat. 2016;57:14869–87. doi:10.1080/19443994.2015.1069216.
  • Camacho LM, Dumée L, Zhang J, Li J, Duke M. Advances in membrane distillation for water desalination and purification applications. 2013;94–196. doi:10.3390/w5010094.
  • Khalifa A, Ahmad H, Antar M, Laoui T, Khayet M. Experimental and theoretical investigations on water desalination using direct contact membrane distillation. Desalination. 2017;404:22–34. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2016.10.009.
  • Ruiz-Aguirre A, Andrés-Mañas JA, Fernández-Sevilla JM, Zaragoza G. Modeling and optimization of a commercial permeate gap spiral wound membrane distillation module for seawater desalination. Desalination. 2017;419:160–8. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.06.019.
  • Olatunji SO, Camacho LM. Heat and mass transport in modeling membrane distillation configurations: A review. Front Energy Res. 2018;6:1–18. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2018.00130.
  • Noamani S, Sadrzadeh M, Tehrani-Bagha AR. Prospects of nanocomposite membranes for water treatment by membrane distillation. In: Sadrzadeh M, Mohammadi T, editors. Nanocomposite Membranes for Water and Gas Separation. Elsevier; 2020. p. 299–320. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816710-6.00012-2.
  • Duong HC, Cooper P, Nelemans B, Cath TY, Nghiem LD. Evaluating energy consumption of air gap membrane distillation for seawater desalination at pilot scale level. Sep Purif Technol. 2016;166:55–62. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2016.04.014.
  • Eykens L, Hitsov I, De Sitter K, Dotremont C, Pinoy L, Van der Bruggen B. Direct contact and air gap membrane distillation: Differences and similarities between lab and pilot scale. Desalination. 2017;422:91–100. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2017.08.018.
  • Shahu VT, Thombre SB. Air gap membrane distillation: A review. J Renew Sustain Energy. 2019;11. doi:10.1063/1.5063766.
  • Fadhil S, Alsalhy QF, Makki HF, Ruby-Figueroa R, Marino T, Criscuoli A, et al. Seawater desalination using PVDF-HFP membrane in DCMD process: assessment of operating condition by response surface method. Chem Eng Commun. 2018;1–10. doi:10.1080/00986445.2018.1483349.
  • Mustafa A, Aljumaily M, Alsaadi A, Hashim NA, Alsalhy QF, Mjalli FS, et al. PVDF-co-HFP/superhydrophobic acetylene-based nanocarbon hybrid membrane for seawater desalination via DCMD. Chem Eng Res Des. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2018.08.032.
  • Hashim NA, Alsalhy QF, Das R, Mjalli FS. Embedded high-hydrophobic CNMs prepared by CVD technique with PVDF-co-HFP membrane for application in water desalination by DCMD. Desal Water Treat. 2019;142:23431. doi:10.5004/dwt.2019.23431.
  • Lee J, Kim Y, Francis L, Amy G. Performance modeling of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) seawater desalination process using a commercial composite membrane. J Membr Sci. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.053.
  • Khayet M. Membranes and theoretical modeling of membrane distillation: A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;164:56–88. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2010.09.005.
  • El-Bourawi MS, Ding Z, Ma R, Khayet M. A framework for better understanding membrane distillation separation process. J Membr Sci. 2006;285:4–29. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.002.
  • Bouchrit R, Boubakri A, Ha A, Bouguecha SA. Direct contact membrane distillation: Capability to treat hyper-saline solution. Desalination. 2015;376:117–29. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.014.
  • Eykens L, De Sitter K, Dotremont C, Pinoy L, Van Der Bruggen B. Membrane synthesis for membrane distillation: A review. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;182:36–51. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.03.035.
  • Abrofarakh M, Sadeghi M, Khayet M. Investigation of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance using CFD and machine learning approaches. Chemosphere. 2024;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.137560.
  • Khayet M, Cojocaru C, García-Payo MC. Mechanistic analysis of heat and mass transfer in direct contact membrane distillation. Desalination. 2023;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.115736.
  • Lee HJ, Kim YS, Lee YM, Lee HS. Improved transport correlations for direct contact membrane distillation modeling. Desalination. 2023;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.115736.
  • Zhao Y, Zhang X, Zhang L, Liu Y, Wang L. CFD simulation of spacer-filled direct contact membrane distillation channels. Desalination. 2023;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.115736.
  • Chen XB, Zhang L, Liu Y, Wang L, Zhao Y. Local hydrodynamics and flux distribution in direct contact membrane distillation: Experimental and numerical study. Energy. 2022;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123456.
  • Nasr A, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang L, Zhao Y. Multi-channel module CFD optimization for direct contact membrane distillation. Desalination. 2024;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.115736.
  • Khalifa AE, Zhang X, Liu Y, Wang L, Zhao Y. Transient modeling of solar-assisted direct contact membrane distillation with heat recovery. Energy. 2024;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.123456.
  • Gupta D, Kumar P, Sharma P, Singh RK, Yadav S. Dynamic response of direct contact membrane distillation under variable thermal inputs. Energy Convers Manag. 2025;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.123456.
  • Al-Harthi S, Al-Mansoori M, Al-Mazroei A, Al-Shamsi A, Al-Suwaidi A. Techno-economic assessment of direct contact membrane distillation–solar hybrid desalination systems. Desalination. 2025;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2025.115736.
  • Shanmugan S, Kumar P, Gupta R, Yadav S, Singh RK. System-scale modeling and optimization of direct contact membrane distillation integrated with renewable energy. Energy Rep. 2024;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2024.123456.
  • Choubani K, Sammoudi M, Ennetta R. Performance modelling of direct contact membrane distillation for flat-sheet modules. Desal Water Treat. 2022;265:1–13. doi:10.5004/dwt.2022.28553.
  • Khatab MZ, Abdelsamie MM, Arafat HA, Hassan Ali MI. A novel planar module design for improved DCMD: Experimental and CFD insights. Int J Thermofluids. 2025;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101391.
  • Zhang T, Liu Y, Wang L, Zhao Y, Zhang X. Capillary intrusion and wetting transition modeling in direct contact membrane distillation membranes. Desalination. 2023;1(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.115736.
  • Lee J, Lee E, Jeong S, Guo J, Kyoungjin A. Theoretical modeling and experimental validation of transport and separation properties of carbon nanotube electrospun membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 2017;526:395–408. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.045.
  • Winter D. Membrane distillation, a thermodynamic, technological and economic analysis. 2015.
  • Rao G, Hiibel SR, Childress AE. Simplified flux prediction in direct contact membrane distillation using a membrane structural parameter. Desalination. 2014;351:151–62. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.07.006.
  • Hitsov I. Model based analysis and optimization of membrane distillation. 2017.
  • Khayet TM. Membrane distillation principles and applications. 2011.
  • Hitsov I, Eykens L, De Schepper W, De Sitter K, Dotremont C, Nopens I. Full scale direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) model including membrane compaction effects. J Membr Sci. 2017;524:245–56. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.044.
  • Ali A, Macedonio F, Drioli E, Aljlil S, Alharbi OA. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of temperature polarization phenomenon in direct contact membrane. Chem Eng Res Des. 2013;1–12. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2013.06.030.
  • Manawi YM, Khraisheh M, Kayvani A, Benyahia F, Adham S. Effect of operational parameters on distillate flux in direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): Comparison between experimental and model predicted performance. Desalination. 2014;336:110–20. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.01.003.
  • Jung H, He K, Gray S, Zhang J, Shik I. Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): Experimental study on the commercial PTFE membrane and modeling. J Membr Sci. 2011;371:90–8. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.020.
  • Andrjesdóttir O, Lee C, Nabavi M, Paredes S, Khalil ASG, Michel B. An experimentally optimized model for heat and mass transfer in direct contact membrane distillation. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2013;66:855–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.07.051.
  • Swaminathan J, Chung HW, Warsinger DM, Lienhard JH. Energy efficiency of membrane distillation up to high salinity: Evaluating critical system size and optimal membrane thickness. Appl Energy. 2018;211:715–34. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.043.
  • Xu L, Xu S, Wu X, Wang P, Jin D, Hu J, et al. Heat and mass transfer evaluation of air-gap diffusion distillation by ε-NTU method. Desalination. 2020;478. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2019.114281.
  • Gryta M, Tomaszewska M, Morawski AW. Membrane distillation with laminar flow. Sep Purif Technol. 1997;11:93–101. doi:10.1016/S1383-5866(97)00002-6.
  • Tehrani-Bagha AR. Waterproof breathable layers – A review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;268:114–35. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2019.03.006.
  • Phattaranawik J, Jiraratananon R, Fane AG. Effect of pore size distribution and air flux on mass transport in direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci. 2003;215:75–85. doi:10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00603-8.
  • Va MI. Temperature and concentration polarization in membrane distillation of aqueous salt solutions. J Membr Sci. 1999;156.
  • Zuo G, Wang R, Field R, Fane AG. Energy efficiency evaluation and economic analyses of direct contact membrane distillation system using Aspen Plus. Desalination. 2011;283:237–44. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.048.
  • Swaminathan J, Chung HW, Warsinger DM, Lienhard JH. Membrane distillation model based on heat exchanger theory and configuration comparison. Appl Energy. 2016;184:491–505. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.090.
  • Noamani S, Niroomand S, Rastgar M, McDonald A, Sadrzadeh M. Development of a self-sustained model to predict the performance of direct contact membrane distillation. Sep Purif Technol. 2021;118407. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118407.